Paddy Power Forced to Pull Offensive Oscar Pistorius Ad by Ad Authority

Paddy P<span id="more-1413"></span>ower Forced to Pull Offensive Oscar Pistorius Ad by Ad Authority

After a record number of complaints, a Paddy Power ad that featured alleged murderer Oscar Pistorius will be pulled.

After fielding an archive 5,200 complaints, Irish bookmaker Paddy energy has been forced to pull an offensive ad from its UK publications, because well to be investigated by the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA). The ad which many felt at best trivialized the current and ongoing murder trial of Paralympian Oscar Pistorius, and at worst exploited it for profit was ordered down early in the day this week by the ASA after being inundated with input from horrified citizens.

Making Light of Pistorius Murder Trial

The printing ad which had appeared in the UK press recently, along with on the Paddy energy website and social media marketing feeds offered chances on the results of the trial stating:


Pistorius’ face appeared photoshopped onto an Oscar statuette a reference to the recently aired Academy Awards, which were held in Los Angeles as the murder trial got underway in South Africa. According to over 122,000 signatories of a online petition, however, Pistorius’ girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp’s alleged murder in February 2013 at the fingers of her boyfriend should be no laughing matter.

‘A young girl has been killed,’ said Jean Hatchet, organizer of the petition. ‘There is no doubt that she was killed by this man, whether or not he intended to kill her.’ The Paddy Power advertising, she says, is ‘an incredibly awful, callous thing.’

The ASA said it would publish its findings and proffer any sanctions in due course. Meanwhile, the business was clear in its disdain for the message.

‘We consider the ad may be seriously prejudicial towards the general public on the ground associated with the likely further serious and/or widespread offence it may cause,’ noted an ASA-issued statement that had been released by the middle of week. ‘We are also concerned that the reputation that is good of advertising industry may be further damaged by continued publication with this advertising.’

Paddy Power noted that the print campaign was just meant to operate in conjunction with the other day’s Oscars anyway, and claimed it only ran once in A uk paper sunday. Although the ASA said the Ireland-based business’s web site was away from its jurisdiction, a look at the site by late this week showed no trace of the ad whatsoever, nor any mention of its existence ever. A search for the business’s web site’s betting options also revealed no matches for the word ‘Pistorius,’ though whether that indicates the bet is off is anyone’s guess.

Not the First Offensive Ad from Paddy Energy

Paddy energy with a reputation for this type of risqué strategy remained defiant, but seemed to fully miss the moral dimension, telling media: ‘Trial wagering as a whole isn’t a common event, but there is certainly nothing new about wagering on the end result of the absolute most high-profile court instances and they do not come any more high-profile than this. Given the rolling coverage of this test, pretty everyone that is much be discussing it and speculating on the verdict. We’re therefore anticipating a number of our customers to wish to put their money where their mouth is.’

Hatchet has requested that the earnings created from the Pistorius bet should be donated to women’s charities, to which Paddy Power retorted: ‘We’re providing wagering on the results of an effort. It is about whether Pistorius will likely be found guilty or not guilty, it is not a wagering market on domestic physical violence.’

It is far from the initial of numerous Paddy Power campaigns that deliberately seeks to court controversy.

The business was when forced to pull billboard posters that showed Jesus and the Apostles gambling during the Last Supper. And this season, A tv spot that showed a blind soccer player kicking a cat into a tree was the absolute most complained about spot associated with 12 months. The decision was additionally made to pull another TV spot that featured transvestites at a competition meet, and invited its customers to ‘spot the stallions among the mares’.

Of course, Paddy energy has achieved its real objective once more: to force its brand name into the papers and get people talking about its marketing campaigns. However, at any given time when politicians in britain are questioning the amount of gambling ads on television which they say can very quickly be looked at by minors, this might be publicity that the gambling industry could probably do without.

Junior Middleweight Champ Molina Jailed Before MGM Garden Fight Night

Current IBF Junior Middleweight champ Carlos Molina at the MGM Grand Garden Arena straight back on Sept. 14, 2013. Molina is hoping to be released with time for Saturday’s match against undefeated Jermall Charlo. (Image: Mark Hundley/Las Las Vegas Sun)

UPDATE March 8, 2014: Carlos Molina had not been released from Clark County Detention Center on Friday, therefore the Saturday MGM Grand Garden Arena fight was terminated. It appears the main explanation ended up being because theoretically Molina is considered an illegal alien and was desired by immigration officials, despite having lived in the U.S. since age four.

‘He’s not getting away from jail to fight, and we don’t know as he is getting out,’ said Warriors Boxing promoter Leon Margules in a ESPN interview. ‘It’s because of his immigration status. He is an illegal alien.’


It’s a development that has promoters and bookmakers chewing through their finger nails: Carlos ‘King’ Molina’s planned defense of his IBF junior middleweight world title fight at the MGM Grand Garden Saturday against undefeated opponent Jermall Charlo may not go ahead because Molina was nevertheless in jail awaiting launch as we went along to press on Friday’s weigh-in day.

Arrested on Outstanding Warrants

Molina was arrested soon after his press seminar at the MGM Grand earlier in the week on a fugitive warrant, stemming from a 2007 parole violation for failing to register as a sex offender. In 2002, he was convicted of second-degree assault on a minor in Outgamie, Wisconsin.

Meanwhile, it has also emerged that Appleton, Wisconsin police have disorderly conduct warrant out for him, dating back once again to 2005.

On morning, Clark County prosecutor Bart Pace agreed to set Molina’s bail at $10,000 with the agreement of Wisconsin authorities; however, as Molina’s representatives scrambled to secure his release in time for the bout against challenger Jermall Charlo, he still needs to clear an immigration hold (he was born in Mexico, but has lived in the US since age four), and currently remains in Clark County Detention Center Las Vegas’ main holding lockdown for bad boys thursday.

Molina’s promoter, Leon Margules, said: ‘We made an understanding with Wisconsin for the fighter’s release in the sex offender enrollment violation. The immigration problem is a little more complicated. I’m still looking for exactly why Carlos is being held. I’m hopeful we are able to get it resolved, get him released and get him into the ring Saturday. He told me he is supporting well, but he wants to get out and he desires to fight Saturday.’

Monday puts that are hearing in Doubt

The fact that records show that his next hearing has been set for this coming Monday throws that into doubt while authorities initially said they expected the boxer to be released in time for the fight.

At a press meeting on Thursday, Richard Schaefer, CEO of Golden Boy Promotions, remained upbeat: ‘I’m waiting to hear from Molina’s people,’ he stated. ‘They’re managing all of Molina’s issues. We need not produce a choice in the battle until the weigh-in (Friday). But I am aware Carlos wishes to fight. He’s very anxious to get within the band and he is actually fired up.’

However, Schaefer revealed that, should they don’t spring the miscreant champ from his jail cellular, he includes a back-up plan: ‘Just in case, this is simply for the pay-per-view audience to know … then we would, of course, have the luxury of upgrading Ricardo Alvarez against Thompson to your pay-per-view card. if that fight does not happen,’

While watchers may be covered regardless, it’s a total headache for the bookmakers, obviously: collectively, vast amounts in wagers pass through their hands on big Vegas fight nights and may this bout fail to materialize those bets could have become returned.

Meanwhile, Molina’s opponent is trying to keep a clear head: ‘When I first heard it, I didn’t think it,’ said Charlo. ‘I thought my trainer [Ronnie Shields] was kidding. But I’m going to help keep doing everything the same way as if we are going to fight. I’ll stay concentrated. I’m going in which to stay shape. I’m not going to be distracted.’

Downtown Grand Sued When Man Loses $500K in Alleged Blackout State

Weekend 52-year-old Mark Johnston from Los Angeles is suing the Downtown Grand in Las Vegas, after losing $500K wagering on Super Bowl. Johnston claims he ended up being blacked out and did not understand what he had been doing. (Image: CNN)

Did there is a Super that is rough Bowl, wagering-wise? Perhaps you bet in the Broncos, or even the blowout took all the life out of your Super Bowl celebration. In any case may be, you didn’t have the sort of issues faced by one serious gambler in Las Vegas, who says he lost $500,000 over that week-end while he was much too inebriated to know very well what he was doing.

Blackout Drunk Continued to Wager

That man Mark that is 52-year-old Johnston from Los Angeles claims that the Downtown Grand in nevada’ Fremont Street area permitted him to gamble while he had been clearly drunk; blackout drunk, in accordance with their own assessment. That lead to him losing half of a million dollars at the pai gow and blackjack tables.

‘I feel just like they picked my pouches,’ said Johnston, a retiree from California. ‘we feel you reach in his pockets and grab all his money like they took a drunk guy…like a drunk guy walking down the street, and.

‘I am not a loser that is sore. I’ve lost fifty per cent of a million. I’ve lost 800,000. I’ve lost bundle. This has nothing to do with that. Demonstrably I are able what I lost,’ said Johnston, who however refuses to classify himself as a ‘whale’ the industry term for a high-roller.

Johnston formerly owned A southern california car dealership, and today owns a Mercedes-Benz worth $250,000; making his modesty regarding his gambling status a tad disingenuous.

Although he claims he has perhaps not blacked out previously, he also claims to have been served 20-30 products, making one wonder how they can keep in mind that, yet not his gambling play per se. But the rich aren’t richer than we have been because they don’t know how to play hardball, and Johnston is not any exception to that particular guideline; he appears happy to try out the victim card in this scenario.

‘This is approximately you nearly killing me personally. What if I’d gone to bed that night, with all those drinks in me personally, and I also threw up on myself and I choked and passed away?’ Johnston said, having a dramatic flair that individuals can only admire from afar. That being stated, even he fesses up to having had as 10 drinks while planing a trip to Vegas and in the limo before he even hit the gaming floor.

‘ My responsibility is, look, some drinks were had by me at the airport, on the air plane. At some point, that is my duty,’ the gambler said. ‘The unfortunate component about it for them is, they’ve a bigger obligation than i really do.’

According to Johnston’s attorney Sean Lyttle, The Grand is countersuing in an attempt to gather their customer’s debts; although other media sources have reported that the casino has offered to settle at a 20 percent discount $400K but that Johnston will not go that path. Meanwhile, Johnston has placed a stop-payment order regarding the debt re payments The Grand ended up being trying to collect, and is also suing them for damaging their reputation.

Nevada Law Places Onus on Casinos

It turns out that per Nevada legislation casinos are, in reality, banned from allowing visibly drunk gamblers from continuing to wager cash. They’re also supposed to take off the drinks that are free they can inform someone has had one a lot of. The grey area right here can be who determines what constitutes how many, and in what criteria. After all, if Johnston was able to place wagers even in a blackout state, he might be in as he claims how was the casino to know what impaired state?

Nonetheless, regulatory authorities are using the situation quite really. So even though The Grand doesn’t comment on pending litigation, Nevada’s Gaming Control Board is reportedly investigating the full case one that Lyttle says is quite unusual.

‘It’s certainly an extraordinary case,’ Lyttle stated. ‘ This is not a whole story that I’ve ever heard before, where someone was blackout intoxicated where they couldn’t read their cards, yet a casino continued to serve them beverages and issue them more markers. It’s a very heavy-handed and unusual approach that we haven’t seen in this town in a number of years.’

Based on Johnston, he is an everyday in Las Vegas and was invited to The Grand for Super Bowl along with his girlfriend, though he mostly gambled on his own weekend. His lawsuit alleges that The Grand gave him lots of free drinks after he previously already been drinking at dinner, and that he didn’t realize how much he had lost until Sunday.

While Johnston lost big over Super Bowl weekend, he was not the only person. With most of the public money in the Broncos, the Nevada sportsbooks won almost $20 million from gamblers on the NFL’s championship game this year after a record number of betting.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.